bulletin_capa genérica
SHINNEMAN, Amy
URBANCZIK, Aleš
Don St. John
BAILEY, Greer
Lu Mueller-Kaul
SCHWIND, Peter
SKILLMAN, MaryAnn
WANG, Tina J.
MULLER-KAUL, Lu
CHAITOW, Leon
KINNUNEN, Jeffrey
MUELLER-KAUL, Lu
Pages: 27-30
Editor’s note: The following is, to my knowledge, the first time that a case evaluation has appeared in print. Contributing to this assessment are Neal Powers (Neal Winblads Rolfer), and two members of the Education Committee, Peter Melchior and Emmett Hutching. Peter and Emmett viewed the photographs independently. Without bereft of prior consultation with each other or with Neal Powers. Admittedly, photographs provide a limited amount of information about the Rolfing process. Peter expressed concern that “didactic pronouncements about photographs not be misconstrued to “assume the rnagnitude of dogma.” Evaluating the progress of the one client in this fashion, however, is not merely for the purpose of critical assessment of one Rolfers worrk. The intention is more one of mutual education, as well as to lest the language upon which our work relies. Future systematic efforts such as this may go much further toward refining that language.
View abstract